Epstein File EFTA00208564: Privilege and Treat (DS9)

Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00208564

💨IMPACT LEVEL 1 — MEH

Epstein File EFTA00208564: Privilege and Treat (DS9)

CorrespondenceDate unavailableEFTA002085641 keyword hits

0

views

0

shares

0

reactions

0

persons

3

keywords

6

excerpts

Email correspondence dated August 6, 2013, between Paul Cassell and Jackie Perczek (with Brad Edwards copied) discussing legal arguments regarding attorney-client privilege and jurisdictional questions in a motion. The exchange addresses whether privilege applies to a motion to treat a motion to dismiss as equivalent to a jurisdictional matter, with Cassell arguing that privilege is central to both the jurisdictional and merits questions.

👤 Named in This Document

No named persons linked yet

🔑 Evidence Keywords

privilege treat client

📋 Key Excerpts6

PersonKeyword

Excerpt 1

You argue as to jurisdiction that Perlman does not apply because there is no **privilege**. And our argument on the merits is that there is a **privilege**.

Excerpt 2

So **privilege** is at the heart of the jurisdictional question you raise, and at the heart of the merits. They cannot be separated.

Excerpt 3

The Court needs to look at our merits arguments on **privilege** to determine the jurisdiction issue.