Epstein File EFTA00209322: Privilege and Treat (DS9)

Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00209322

💨IMPACT LEVEL 1 — MEH

Epstein File EFTA00209322: Privilege and Treat (DS9)

CorrespondenceDate unavailableEFTA002093221 keyword hits

0

views

0

shares

0

reactions

0

persons

3

keywords

6

excerpts

This document contains legal correspondence dated August 6, 2013, between Paul Cassell, Jackie Perczek, and Brad Edwards discussing a motion and jurisdictional arguments centered on attorney-client privilege. The correspondence indicates that privilege is central to both the jurisdictional question and the merits of the case, with arguments that the court must examine privilege claims to determine jurisdiction.

👤 Named in This Document

No named persons linked yet

🔑 Evidence Keywords

privilege treat client

📋 Key Excerpts6

PersonKeyword

Excerpt 1

You argue as to jurisdiction that Perlman does not apply because there is no **privilege**. And our argument on the merits is that there is a **privilege**.

Excerpt 2

So **privilege** is at the heart of the jurisdictional question you raise, and at the heart of the merits. They cannot be separated.

Excerpt 3

The Court needs to look at our merits arguments on **privilege** to determine the jurisdiction issue.