Epstein File EFTA00210620: Ginsburg, Solicitation and Prostitution (DS9)

Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA00210620

⚡IMPACT LEVEL 3 — NOTEWORTHY

Epstein File EFTA00210620: Ginsburg, Solicitation and Prostitution (DS9)

Court FilingDate unavailableEFTA002106203 keyword hits

0

views

0

shares

0

reactions

4

persons

6

keywords

13

excerpts

A brief legal document discussing potential legal implications of evidence handling, suggesting that even without specific evidence of prejudice from lost or destroyed documents, defendants' interests could be affected.

👤 Named in This Document

Jeffrey Epstein Alexander Acosta Jane Doe Ruth Bader Ginsburg

🔑 Evidence Keywords

destroyed evidence solicitation prostitution immunity non-prosecution agreement sexual abuse

📋 Key Excerpts13

PersonKeyword

Excerpt 1

Even if, as here, there was no showing of specific prejudice in the sense of lost or destroyed evidence, defendants would still be deprived of their interest

Excerpt 2

United States, 552 U.S. 130, 145 (2008) (**Ginsburg**, J., dissenting).

Excerpt 3

Attorney's Office, notifying her that Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida statutes pertaining to felony **solicitation** of prostitution