Epstein File EFTA02520706: Lawrence Krauss, Harvey Weinstein and Privilege (DS11)

Epstein Index›Documents›EFTA02520706

⚡IMPACT LEVEL 3 — NOTEWORTHY

Epstein File EFTA02520706: Lawrence Krauss, Harvey Weinstein and Privilege (DS11)

CorrespondenceDate unavailableEFTA025207061 keyword hits

0

views

0

shares

0

reactions

2

persons

2

keywords

7

excerpts

This document references legal counsel Adam Waldman representing Professor Lawrence Krauss in response to allegations initiated by an online entertainment news outlet. It discusses conditional privilege for reporting sexual harassment under administrative investigation law, citing Paros v. (1993). The document addresses defamation charges and references Harvey Weinstein in the title, though Weinstein is not mentioned in the provided excerpts.

👤 Named in This Document

Lawrence Krauss Harvey Weinstein

🔑 Evidence Keywords

privilege entertainment

📋 Key Excerpts7

PersonKeyword

Excerpt 1

=/div> Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a **privilege** ag=inst a defamation charge. In Paros V.

Excerpt 2

Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the existence of a conditional **privilege** for employees to report perceived acts of sexual harassment as public policy

Excerpt 3

Because this was initiated by an onl=ne **entertainment** news outlet with a clear agenda and established record of propagating false allegations about me,